Hello, I'm starting grade devellopment giving some benefits. I would like advice.
Armed Forces = Fleet.
Defensive force = Defenses.
GRADES:
1- Minor (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, production technology).
2- Raider (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Armed Force, Weapon Technology, Speed Technology).
3- Defensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapons technology, defensive force).
4- Offensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapon technology, speed technology, armed force).
Advantages:
1- Minor
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
2- Raider.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
3- Defensive miner.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
4- Offensive miner.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
Taking into account:
- Statistics.
- User card.
- Combat simulator.
- planet resource update.
- Database.
- not defined.
- not defined.
My question:
To take account of the elements for (GRADES :), are they correct?
GRADES:
1- Minor (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, production technology).
2- Raider (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Armed Force, Weapon Technology, Speed Technology).
3- Defensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapons technology, defensive force).
4- Offensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapon technology, speed technology, armed force).
What do I need to change on the specified grades?
It will be shared property, I just want to know if what is taken into account for each grade seems correct to you.
Armed Forces = Fleet.
Defensive force = Defenses.
GRADES:
1- Minor (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, production technology).
2- Raider (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Armed Force, Weapon Technology, Speed Technology).
3- Defensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapons technology, defensive force).
4- Offensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapon technology, speed technology, armed force).
Advantages:
1- Minor
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
2- Raider.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
3- Defensive miner.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
4- Offensive miner.
grade 1: not defined.
grade 2: not defined.
grade 3: not defined.
Taking into account:
- Statistics.
- User card.
- Combat simulator.
- planet resource update.
- Database.
- not defined.
- not defined.
My question:
To take account of the elements for (GRADES :), are they correct?
GRADES:
1- Minor (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, production technology).
2- Raider (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Armed Force, Weapon Technology, Speed Technology).
3- Defensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapons technology, defensive force).
4- Offensive miner (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3); (Buildings, weapon technology, speed technology, armed force).
What do I need to change on the specified grades?
It will be shared property, I just want to know if what is taken into account for each grade seems correct to you.
The post was edited 2 times, last by jona ().